<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for R Blank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rblank.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rblank.com</link>
	<description>Straddling the Grid, the Digital Divide, and Interstate-5, from Venice Beach to Umpqua National Forest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and Web by akos</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>akos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2298#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Dont worry. Air is far from dead. There are a ton of apps both appstore and android market to serve as an introduction. Further more, i just quit my job in order to remain active within the platform. 

You said something about some exodus of &quot;talent&quot; you forgot the quotes. Flash is no longer an artist&#039;s tool thx to as3 which BTW is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont worry. Air is far from dead. There are a ton of apps both appstore and android market to serve as an introduction. Further more, i just quit my job in order to remain active within the platform. </p>
<p>You said something about some exodus of &#8220;talent&#8221; you forgot the quotes. Flash is no longer an artist&#8217;s tool thx to as3 which BTW is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by Ivan Moreno</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Moreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>Last week’s announcements from Adobe were a slap in the face to all these companies who have been investing time and money on their products, and a step backward in the creativity and technical development. All of us (The developers) knew that Flash platform was slowly moving to something else, and HTML will be a readable environment to work with in some years. Now, with the market more misinformed and with no trust in Adobe decisions, it is harder to transmit this commitment to the clients and users. In a personal basis, Flash will still be a tool to use for the next years, but probably in personal projects only. 

Starting to make more HTML5 content it’s a good alternative, knowing the capabilities of this technology and the penetration rate, and maybe push it further; but in this case, it is good that we do not require any Adobe tools to complete this task.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week’s announcements from Adobe were a slap in the face to all these companies who have been investing time and money on their products, and a step backward in the creativity and technical development. All of us (The developers) knew that Flash platform was slowly moving to something else, and HTML will be a readable environment to work with in some years. Now, with the market more misinformed and with no trust in Adobe decisions, it is harder to transmit this commitment to the clients and users. In a personal basis, Flash will still be a tool to use for the next years, but probably in personal projects only. </p>
<p>Starting to make more HTML5 content it’s a good alternative, knowing the capabilities of this technology and the penetration rate, and maybe push it further; but in this case, it is good that we do not require any Adobe tools to complete this task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>Adobe&#039;s announcements from the week of November 7th, regarding the future of Flash, essentially negate the argument above. For my more current thoughts, check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this more current post on the future of Flash and AIR&lt;/a&gt;.

Despite how wrong this post is today, I&#039;m glad I wrote it. It was a moment in time, fueled by misinformation and confusion. This post gave voice to an underlying primal yell from the community, so at least Adobe knew what it was giving up on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe&#8217;s announcements from the week of November 7th, regarding the future of Flash, essentially negate the argument above. For my more current thoughts, check out <a href="http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/" rel="nofollow">this more current post on the future of Flash and AIR</a>.</p>
<p>Despite how wrong this post is today, I&#8217;m glad I wrote it. It was a moment in time, fueled by misinformation and confusion. This post gave voice to an underlying primal yell from the community, so at least Adobe knew what it was giving up on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>Man, I couldn&#039;t agree more. But Adobe just deep-sixed any remaining chance of clients taking Flash seriously. The work is just not gonna be there -- as cost-effective as it might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. But Adobe just deep-sixed any remaining chance of clients taking Flash seriously. The work is just not gonna be there &#8212; as cost-effective as it might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by David Salahi</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>David Salahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>r,
You are correct. But &quot;easier for me&quot; translates into &quot;cheaper for them.&quot; It&#039;s a shame that they will have to pay more to have the work done in JavaScript. Or settle for a less sophisticated UI. Or both.

David Salahi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r,<br />
You are correct. But &#8220;easier for me&#8221; translates into &#8220;cheaper for them.&#8221; It&#8217;s a shame that they will have to pay more to have the work done in JavaScript. Or settle for a less sophisticated UI. Or both.</p>
<p>David Salahi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>Clients won&#039;t pay you to work in a technology they believe is dead, just because it&#039;s easier for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clients won&#8217;t pay you to work in a technology they believe is dead, just because it&#8217;s easier for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by David Salahi</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>David Salahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>polyGeek,
Tooling for Flex is HUGE! That&#039;s an important part of the reason I prefer Flex to JavaScript. I recently worked on a .NET project in which the client-side was done with jQuery and it was painful. Overall, I have to say that Visual Studio is a better IDE than Flash Builder/Eclipse. But, its advantages come into play mostly with C# or VB. It doesn&#039;t help much when dealing with an uncompiled language like JavaScript. For one thing, you can&#039;t use the VS debugger. You have to debug in each browser. For another thing, the Intellisense when coding in JS is minimal. I could go on but suffice it to say that the efficiency of Flash Builder is a big advantage over coding JS in VS or Dreamweaver.

David Salahi
Adobe Certified Expert, Flex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>polyGeek,<br />
Tooling for Flex is HUGE! That&#8217;s an important part of the reason I prefer Flex to JavaScript. I recently worked on a .NET project in which the client-side was done with jQuery and it was painful. Overall, I have to say that Visual Studio is a better IDE than Flash Builder/Eclipse. But, its advantages come into play mostly with C# or VB. It doesn&#8217;t help much when dealing with an uncompiled language like JavaScript. For one thing, you can&#8217;t use the VS debugger. You have to debug in each browser. For another thing, the Intellisense when coding in JS is minimal. I could go on but suffice it to say that the efficiency of Flash Builder is a big advantage over coding JS in VS or Dreamweaver.</p>
<p>David Salahi<br />
Adobe Certified Expert, Flex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and Web by clive</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 07:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2298#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>I have been attending The HTML 5 Game Summits up in the Bay Area and at least for the next few years, Flash is going to be a main stay for Desktop Web Games. The HTML - CSS - JavaScript option is really 2-4 years behind flash 10 player. But an very important point. People by far, do not play flash games on there mobile phones or pads. Its a Horrid experience (I have tried). Apple and Android have them trained to always buy or try games that are native. That means AIR or publishing Flash to the native format (Just like Unity).

But I do really wonder about commercial sites and flash. Many of the larger sites have been making 2 versions of there sites for the last 2 years (Iphone/Mobile Phone) and one for home PC users. So Is this really going to change the current trend? Your company makes fantastic user experiences for both Flash and non flash sites and as you know Mobile Sites do NOT look like Desktop sites. So Is things really going to change that fast? 

I have android phone and Flash sites look just bad on them. I really want them to look good but there not designed for the small screen, so they just look bad.

So Is it going to kill the market all at once? Do not know. But Games will stick around till someone makes a great easy to develop tool to make kick ass games in the 3 to 9 months time frame that flash can. I do not see that happening tomorrow as the browsers are fighting over what forms of CSS / HTML / JavaScript to use.

Heck were going back to 2001 but no flash or shockwave this time. What a &amp;*(^(&amp; world.

PS&gt; I am busy studying up on Unity - JQuery - and CSS. With a friend like Adobe, it never hurts to buddy up with all the other people in the room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been attending The HTML 5 Game Summits up in the Bay Area and at least for the next few years, Flash is going to be a main stay for Desktop Web Games. The HTML &#8211; CSS &#8211; JavaScript option is really 2-4 years behind flash 10 player. But an very important point. People by far, do not play flash games on there mobile phones or pads. Its a Horrid experience (I have tried). Apple and Android have them trained to always buy or try games that are native. That means AIR or publishing Flash to the native format (Just like Unity).</p>
<p>But I do really wonder about commercial sites and flash. Many of the larger sites have been making 2 versions of there sites for the last 2 years (Iphone/Mobile Phone) and one for home PC users. So Is this really going to change the current trend? Your company makes fantastic user experiences for both Flash and non flash sites and as you know Mobile Sites do NOT look like Desktop sites. So Is things really going to change that fast? </p>
<p>I have android phone and Flash sites look just bad on them. I really want them to look good but there not designed for the small screen, so they just look bad.</p>
<p>So Is it going to kill the market all at once? Do not know. But Games will stick around till someone makes a great easy to develop tool to make kick ass games in the 3 to 9 months time frame that flash can. I do not see that happening tomorrow as the browsers are fighting over what forms of CSS / HTML / JavaScript to use.</p>
<p>Heck were going back to 2001 but no flash or shockwave this time. What a &amp;*(^(&amp; world.</p>
<p>PS&gt; I am busy studying up on Unity &#8211; JQuery &#8211; and CSS. With a friend like Adobe, it never hurts to buddy up with all the other people in the room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by clive</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Well. Its kind of hard to even say. Ive been a Flash Developer for over 10 years and this to me just scares the shit out of me. It scares me for the simple reason: Adobe has no idea of what to do. Or even more scary, they do.

If they did, well why the hell would they kill something in such a public way as signal that &quot;WE HAVE GIVEN UP ON FLASH&quot;. Since HTML 5 and CSS3 can do many of the Flash motion stuff, adobe is basically saying: The future is not flash its HTML and CSS. We will still make money selling tools to do that, so we can just dump the flash platform so we can get on with it.

Oh Ya, You can still make Apps with AIR and have them on IOS and Android so do NOT worry about it. Heck there is a Lot of work the ex flash developers can do as they take major pay cuts to learn CSS3 - HTML5 - and JavaScript for the next few years. What you have spent many years working and promoting flash? Well don&#039;t worry about anything. We at Adobe have everything covered for you. Trust us with your work life as we have a plan. We understand users and the industry and how are public actions effect them.

Trust us. We do have a message. Its just not the one you want to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. Its kind of hard to even say. Ive been a Flash Developer for over 10 years and this to me just scares the shit out of me. It scares me for the simple reason: Adobe has no idea of what to do. Or even more scary, they do.</p>
<p>If they did, well why the hell would they kill something in such a public way as signal that &#8220;WE HAVE GIVEN UP ON FLASH&#8221;. Since HTML 5 and CSS3 can do many of the Flash motion stuff, adobe is basically saying: The future is not flash its HTML and CSS. We will still make money selling tools to do that, so we can just dump the flash platform so we can get on with it.</p>
<p>Oh Ya, You can still make Apps with AIR and have them on IOS and Android so do NOT worry about it. Heck there is a Lot of work the ex flash developers can do as they take major pay cuts to learn CSS3 &#8211; HTML5 &#8211; and JavaScript for the next few years. What you have spent many years working and promoting flash? Well don&#8217;t worry about anything. We at Adobe have everything covered for you. Trust us with your work life as we have a plan. We understand users and the industry and how are public actions effect them.</p>
<p>Trust us. We do have a message. Its just not the one you want to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by victor</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 01:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>I do totally agree. Even finding skilled as3 developers will became more and more painful. The community will became weaker as clients are attracted by html5 hype even if it does not offer the same opportunities as flash. And young students are not interested in learning just-another-videogame-framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do totally agree. Even finding skilled as3 developers will became more and more painful. The community will became weaker as clients are attracted by html5 hype even if it does not offer the same opportunities as flash. And young students are not interested in learning just-another-videogame-framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Yup. A &#039;master plan&#039;. Gotta be it.

Tonight, Adobe, we shall take over the world. Muhuahuahuahua.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. A &#8216;master plan&#8217;. Gotta be it.</p>
<p>Tonight, Adobe, we shall take over the world. Muhuahuahuahua.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Hey outthere,

sorry ... but ... is any one upcoming to the idea that it is a marketing action or something else?
Such a huge company didn`t make anything without knowing results of actions.

I believe there will be a master plan behind the announcement. In my eyes they will make more attractive web and cloud applications. Perhaps mobile will grow the next years, but in our technology age is always a option to start with a new or old technology into a growing internet ....
For more about then ten years JavaScript should be died and today there is no website without jQuery or Prototype.

It`s true that companies with focus on flash and mobile getting hard times. But that`s business risk.

Let us looking forward and don`t be to negative about the announcements.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey outthere,</p>
<p>sorry &#8230; but &#8230; is any one upcoming to the idea that it is a marketing action or something else?<br />
Such a huge company didn`t make anything without knowing results of actions.</p>
<p>I believe there will be a master plan behind the announcement. In my eyes they will make more attractive web and cloud applications. Perhaps mobile will grow the next years, but in our technology age is always a option to start with a new or old technology into a growing internet &#8230;.<br />
For more about then ten years JavaScript should be died and today there is no website without jQuery or Prototype.</p>
<p>It`s true that companies with focus on flash and mobile getting hard times. But that`s business risk.</p>
<p>Let us looking forward and don`t be to negative about the announcements.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-997</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad HTML5 canvas has such awesome tools for development. I&#039;m also glad the standard is finished. While I&#039;m at it, I&#039;m glad that HTML5 canvas works so well on IE6 and IE7 (still held onto by a significant portion of the corporate and education market). I&#039;m just glad. 

Oh... wait. None of that is true. 

HTML5 Canvas is a better solution in many cases. Not all. Maybe if you weren&#039;t so blinded by the shit you read on the internet you&#039;d hate less &quot;the technology your friends and pundits&quot; hate so much. It&#039;s just technology and tools. No need to bring douch-hattery into the argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad HTML5 canvas has such awesome tools for development. I&#8217;m also glad the standard is finished. While I&#8217;m at it, I&#8217;m glad that HTML5 canvas works so well on IE6 and IE7 (still held onto by a significant portion of the corporate and education market). I&#8217;m just glad. </p>
<p>Oh&#8230; wait. None of that is true. </p>
<p>HTML5 Canvas is a better solution in many cases. Not all. Maybe if you weren&#8217;t so blinded by the shit you read on the internet you&#8217;d hate less &#8220;the technology your friends and pundits&#8221; hate so much. It&#8217;s just technology and tools. No need to bring douch-hattery into the argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by Ferfoor</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferfoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-995</guid>
		<description>I meant by &quot;then make the suitable modifications to suit their product (mainly Flash)&quot; is to make it NATIVE Flash Internet browser, not plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant by &#8220;then make the suitable modifications to suit their product (mainly Flash)&#8221; is to make it NATIVE Flash Internet browser, not plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by Ferfoor</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferfoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-994</guid>
		<description>My opinion, Adobe should have develop their own internet browser not rely totally on other browsers. They could acquire a company which develop a one then make the suitable modifications to suit their product (mainly Flash) if they don&#039;t want to build it from scratch. Then they could deliver the most optimized browser for Flash and the best compatible for different operating systems.

They didn&#039;t learn from Apple, Apple acquired 2 or 3 companies now to develop their own google map alternative, just for example. Apple trying to make the whole package of software/services in their hands. Adobe spend a lot of money in acquiring companies but they didn&#039;t make the whole package of web browsing experience in their hands. 

What you can notice is adobe is not doing well in internet development, they acquired companies, but after a few years they discontinued their products, Adobe acquired GoLive Systems in 1999 , Also they acquired Adobe Developer ToolBox ADDT in about 2006,

http://www.dmxzone.com/go?16662

And the most expensive acquisition was from macromedia for 3.5 billions in 2005, now we see the heart of this expensive acquisition (Flash as a standard for cross platform not just a development tool like dreamweaver) all are dead.

Adobe Bites then Spits the internet technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion, Adobe should have develop their own internet browser not rely totally on other browsers. They could acquire a company which develop a one then make the suitable modifications to suit their product (mainly Flash) if they don&#8217;t want to build it from scratch. Then they could deliver the most optimized browser for Flash and the best compatible for different operating systems.</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t learn from Apple, Apple acquired 2 or 3 companies now to develop their own google map alternative, just for example. Apple trying to make the whole package of software/services in their hands. Adobe spend a lot of money in acquiring companies but they didn&#8217;t make the whole package of web browsing experience in their hands. </p>
<p>What you can notice is adobe is not doing well in internet development, they acquired companies, but after a few years they discontinued their products, Adobe acquired GoLive Systems in 1999 , Also they acquired Adobe Developer ToolBox ADDT in about 2006,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dmxzone.com/go?16662" rel="nofollow">http://www.dmxzone.com/go?16662</a></p>
<p>And the most expensive acquisition was from macromedia for 3.5 billions in 2005, now we see the heart of this expensive acquisition (Flash as a standard for cross platform not just a development tool like dreamweaver) all are dead.</p>
<p>Adobe Bites then Spits the internet technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and Web by Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2298#comment-992</guid>
		<description>What adobe has clearly done so far is using Flash to catalyse the web needs to their creative products.

About 60% of Adobe&#039;s revenue comes from creative products, and no more than 6%  from Flash Pro. With less usage of web in mobile and more apps downloads, Adobe can&#039;t afford to reduce efforts on Adobe AIR.

Machinarium most sold game on app store at some point, is now on App Store in the desktop, again AIR. The U$13.1 billion generated by the game industry last year is an unprecedented opportunity for Adobe AIR with the new Flash player 3D api.

I can see how investors and clients may be a little anxious due to Adobe not announcing a road map together with their decision.

Adobe AIR development is very, but very active in Adobe&#039;s side these days, and Adobe is not really a waiting the market response kinda company.

I mean, they bought Macromedia, so they bought PhoneGap. Indeed they may have a hard time catalysing their creative product needs via Adobe Edge, but then they have PhoneGap and they clearly pro-acting as well as they can.

But yeah, Adobe, watch out for making sure your nearly 3.000.000 developers community understand and respects you moves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What adobe has clearly done so far is using Flash to catalyse the web needs to their creative products.</p>
<p>About 60% of Adobe&#8217;s revenue comes from creative products, and no more than 6%  from Flash Pro. With less usage of web in mobile and more apps downloads, Adobe can&#8217;t afford to reduce efforts on Adobe AIR.</p>
<p>Machinarium most sold game on app store at some point, is now on App Store in the desktop, again AIR. The U$13.1 billion generated by the game industry last year is an unprecedented opportunity for Adobe AIR with the new Flash player 3D api.</p>
<p>I can see how investors and clients may be a little anxious due to Adobe not announcing a road map together with their decision.</p>
<p>Adobe AIR development is very, but very active in Adobe&#8217;s side these days, and Adobe is not really a waiting the market response kinda company.</p>
<p>I mean, they bought Macromedia, so they bought PhoneGap. Indeed they may have a hard time catalysing their creative product needs via Adobe Edge, but then they have PhoneGap and they clearly pro-acting as well as they can.</p>
<p>But yeah, Adobe, watch out for making sure your nearly 3.000.000 developers community understand and respects you moves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by 使用Flash,HTML5和Unity开发网页游戏的对比 &#124; Flash开发者大会</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>使用Flash,HTML5和Unity开发网页游戏的对比 &#124; Flash开发者大会</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-991</guid>
		<description>[...] Blank wrote a great post called a Case Study in Message Failure. Fascinating reading and some excellent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blank wrote a great post called a Case Study in Message Failure. Fascinating reading and some excellent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and Web by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2298#comment-989</guid>
		<description>I agree that Flash offers a great desktop experience. I completely disagree that you won&#039;t see Flash usage drop. 

I can guarantee you that firms were starting to rewrite their 2012 web budgets before Adobe even finished their conference, removing all the Flash plans that they could -- that was already where things were trending before the announcements. Games are great, but until yesterday they were only a part of the Flash market. There&#039;s not enough growth to be found in browser games to replace what else will be lost. 

As I said, Flash in the browser won&#039;t disappear -- but there will be much, much less of it. 

And yes, Adobe will have decimated their Flash community with these announcements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Flash offers a great desktop experience. I completely disagree that you won&#8217;t see Flash usage drop. </p>
<p>I can guarantee you that firms were starting to rewrite their 2012 web budgets before Adobe even finished their conference, removing all the Flash plans that they could &#8212; that was already where things were trending before the announcements. Games are great, but until yesterday they were only a part of the Flash market. There&#8217;s not enough growth to be found in browser games to replace what else will be lost. </p>
<p>As I said, Flash in the browser won&#8217;t disappear &#8212; but there will be much, much less of it. </p>
<p>And yes, Adobe will have decimated their Flash community with these announcements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and Web by Bram</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 05:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2298#comment-988</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that Flash as a web presence will decline and be left to mass-market to produce. The mobile choice is a logical one -- Lee does clarify it well and makes a good point. As we move on, most of us are having to face the HTML / Flash website building all over again, like we did years ago when Flash was still &quot;new&quot; (ish). The Flash experience is still great for desktops (and I don&#039;t see AIR packaged apps for these kinds of experiences), and the HTML experience will just be left for mobile devices.

Games are a prime example of why I don&#039;t think Flash usage on the web will decline, at least not significantly enough. Look at almost any game on Facebook - they&#039;re all built within the Flash platform and are generating tremendous amounts of revenue for both start-ups and established businesses. As we&#039;re still utilizing desktops, packaging Flash games in AIR for web use doesn&#039;t make sense as we&#039;ve been experiencing more and more in-browser tools &amp; applications, where Flash fits in perfectly.

I do however believe that ActionScripters will be less focused and involved as a community. And that&#039;s a real shame.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Flash as a web presence will decline and be left to mass-market to produce. The mobile choice is a logical one &#8212; Lee does clarify it well and makes a good point. As we move on, most of us are having to face the HTML / Flash website building all over again, like we did years ago when Flash was still &#8220;new&#8221; (ish). The Flash experience is still great for desktops (and I don&#8217;t see AIR packaged apps for these kinds of experiences), and the HTML experience will just be left for mobile devices.</p>
<p>Games are a prime example of why I don&#8217;t think Flash usage on the web will decline, at least not significantly enough. Look at almost any game on Facebook &#8211; they&#8217;re all built within the Flash platform and are generating tremendous amounts of revenue for both start-ups and established businesses. As we&#8217;re still utilizing desktops, packaging Flash games in AIR for web use doesn&#8217;t make sense as we&#8217;ve been experiencing more and more in-browser tools &amp; applications, where Flash fits in perfectly.</p>
<p>I do however believe that ActionScripters will be less focused and involved as a community. And that&#8217;s a real shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-984</guid>
		<description>[...] as I expressed in some length last month, the core value of Flash has always been that it runs everywhere. Yes, people use Flash because it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I expressed in some length last month, the core value of Flash has always been that it runs everywhere. Yes, people use Flash because it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-983</guid>
		<description>I just do not see that many clients approving Flash work moving forward, knowing that it won&#039;t ever run at all on so many devices. 

I agree that there is not yet a replacement -- which means that, over the next couple of years, a lot of work that would have been done in Flash will not get done at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just do not see that many clients approving Flash work moving forward, knowing that it won&#8217;t ever run at all on so many devices. </p>
<p>I agree that there is not yet a replacement &#8212; which means that, over the next couple of years, a lot of work that would have been done in Flash will not get done at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by jim</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-982</guid>
		<description>I worked at Adobe for two years before leaving almost a couple of years ago. I saw the writing on the wall with their Marketing team and the CEO, but even this kind of poor decision making surprises me. The problems are pretty deep. Perhaps they can get acquired where the good products can be kept alive and all the poor ones sold off or disbanded. And the poor management can be sent to their next thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked at Adobe for two years before leaving almost a couple of years ago. I saw the writing on the wall with their Marketing team and the CEO, but even this kind of poor decision making surprises me. The problems are pretty deep. Perhaps they can get acquired where the good products can be kept alive and all the poor ones sold off or disbanded. And the poor management can be sent to their next thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and Web by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/the-future-of-adobe-flash-air-and-web/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2298#comment-981</guid>
		<description>I guess I would add that I agree with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leebrimelow.com/?p=3151&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lee Brimelow that &#039;this is actually the right move for Flash&#039;&lt;/a&gt;. I disagree that this is the right time for such a move, or that the move was executed in anything near a proper manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I would add that I agree with <a href="http://www.leebrimelow.com/?p=3151" rel="nofollow">Lee Brimelow that &#8216;this is actually the right move for Flash&#8217;</a>. I disagree that this is the right time for such a move, or that the move was executed in anything near a proper manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by sHTiF</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>sHTiF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-980</guid>
		<description>I will have to disagree, there is no alternative, HTML5 is a joke, seriously to anyone that worked with it its clear as day that you can&#039;t do any serious development in it. And the future is not bright for games in HTML5 either, its too scattered and constrained and will continue to be that way as W3C standard.

There is Unity as well but wait it works same way flash is going to, it has desktop plugin and focuses on app development in mobile devices. Personally i think we need to wait and see, its not like we can use something different there is none out there.

They did the right thing but in a horrible way, its like being shown in news killing a man without the part where it was clear that the man was a mass murderer trying to kill someone. Far stretched analogy but thats how i see it ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will have to disagree, there is no alternative, HTML5 is a joke, seriously to anyone that worked with it its clear as day that you can&#8217;t do any serious development in it. And the future is not bright for games in HTML5 either, its too scattered and constrained and will continue to be that way as W3C standard.</p>
<p>There is Unity as well but wait it works same way flash is going to, it has desktop plugin and focuses on app development in mobile devices. Personally i think we need to wait and see, its not like we can use something different there is none out there.</p>
<p>They did the right thing but in a horrible way, its like being shown in news killing a man without the part where it was clear that the man was a mass murderer trying to kill someone. Far stretched analogy but thats how i see it <img src='http://www.rblank.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Adobe Flash, AIR and the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-979</guid>
		<description>[...] a significant debate on a wide variety of related topics. I started sharing my reactions earlier, in a separate post on the manner in which these announcements were made public, because I feel that those comments represent an accurate summary of the managerial incompetence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a significant debate on a wide variety of related topics. I started sharing my reactions earlier, in a separate post on the manner in which these announcements were made public, because I feel that those comments represent an accurate summary of the managerial incompetence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Inside of the browser, I completely agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside of the browser, I completely agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by sam</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-977</guid>
		<description>What I feel at the moment as a developer, that web and application development is no more possible using Adobe products and their scripting language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I feel at the moment as a developer, that web and application development is no more possible using Adobe products and their scripting language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Really the Deal With HTML5 and Flash? by Darrell Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/10/20/whats-really-the-deal-with-html5-and-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2216#comment-976</guid>
		<description>R., Let me add an enterprise spin here.  Despite the Nov 9th announcement of &quot;no-Flash-for-mobile&quot;, the main points covered here are still valid. In Flash&#039;s (really Flex/AIR&#039;s) defense is the thought leadership developed over the past six years to migrate Flash from being primarily a designer-centric platform to becoming a enterprise-grade development platform.  

- Starting with Flex 2.0, we witnessed many enterprise developers with J2EE/.NET backgrounds entering the scene because they saw AS/MXML and Flash runtime as a viable means to develop RIAs without the PITA factor that prevailed with AJAX libraries and frameworks at the time.

- They brought with them a mindset of frameworks &amp; micro-architectures (Cairngorm, PureMVC, Granite, etc) to support medium/large-scale development, enterprise-grade SDLC, automated testing, partitioning of client-side business logic, etc.  For a while (and still is for many of our clients), Flex atop Spring/Hibernate was (is) the default for J2EE app dev.  

- At this current time, I am not aware of architectures, frameworks and tools to support HTML5 development ON AN ENTERPRISE-GRADE LEVEL. Sure, Canvas is cool; even some of the CS5.5 features to support HTML5 are neat.  However, authoring tools have to integrate into a meaningful workflow to support 10-25 people muddling through design, build, test, and deploy.  The Flex community has figured out many of these SDLC issues.....when I look at the current state of HTML5 SDLC, it feels very 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R., Let me add an enterprise spin here.  Despite the Nov 9th announcement of &#8220;no-Flash-for-mobile&#8221;, the main points covered here are still valid. In Flash&#8217;s (really Flex/AIR&#8217;s) defense is the thought leadership developed over the past six years to migrate Flash from being primarily a designer-centric platform to becoming a enterprise-grade development platform.  </p>
<p>- Starting with Flex 2.0, we witnessed many enterprise developers with J2EE/.NET backgrounds entering the scene because they saw AS/MXML and Flash runtime as a viable means to develop RIAs without the PITA factor that prevailed with AJAX libraries and frameworks at the time.</p>
<p>- They brought with them a mindset of frameworks &amp; micro-architectures (Cairngorm, PureMVC, Granite, etc) to support medium/large-scale development, enterprise-grade SDLC, automated testing, partitioning of client-side business logic, etc.  For a while (and still is for many of our clients), Flex atop Spring/Hibernate was (is) the default for J2EE app dev.  </p>
<p>- At this current time, I am not aware of architectures, frameworks and tools to support HTML5 development ON AN ENTERPRISE-GRADE LEVEL. Sure, Canvas is cool; even some of the CS5.5 features to support HTML5 are neat.  However, authoring tools have to integrate into a meaningful workflow to support 10-25 people muddling through design, build, test, and deploy.  The Flex community has figured out many of these SDLC issues&#8230;..when I look at the current state of HTML5 SDLC, it feels very 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by r</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-975</guid>
		<description>The post was not intended to sound harsh -- just factual. We&#039;re talking about billions of dollars in shareholder wealth that is clearly being managed by a leadership team incapable of executing the basic marketing requirements of their firm. These people are paid a lot of money to know what they are doing -- and I&#039;m talking about holding them to the same standard of professional performance that my clients expect from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post was not intended to sound harsh &#8212; just factual. We&#8217;re talking about billions of dollars in shareholder wealth that is clearly being managed by a leadership team incapable of executing the basic marketing requirements of their firm. These people are paid a lot of money to know what they are doing &#8212; and I&#8217;m talking about holding them to the same standard of professional performance that my clients expect from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe&#8217;s November 9th Case Study in Message Failure by Ferfoor</title>
		<link>http://www.rblank.com/2011/11/10/adobes-november-9th-case-study-in-message-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferfoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rblank.com/?p=2286#comment-973</guid>
		<description>Adobe raised a sentence logo after Apple statement to ban Flash in iOS, The sentence was something like:

&quot;We Love Freedom&quot; 

To indicate that let the developer choose the technology that they want.

Why these words were vaporized in a minute ?
It is really strange that after Adobe achieved the promising Stage3D technology which can change some negative points of Flash regarding cpu usage, performance &amp; battery draining to kill the Flash Platform. Who can trust Adobe any more?

look what Adobe&#039;s CEO Shantanu Narayen said one and half year ago about the success of Flash as a multi devices design/develop  tool which gets its success from consumers themselves because they want it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93NX9cpgJ4I

why all these words are vaporized now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe raised a sentence logo after Apple statement to ban Flash in iOS, The sentence was something like:</p>
<p>&#8220;We Love Freedom&#8221; </p>
<p>To indicate that let the developer choose the technology that they want.</p>
<p>Why these words were vaporized in a minute ?<br />
It is really strange that after Adobe achieved the promising Stage3D technology which can change some negative points of Flash regarding cpu usage, performance &amp; battery draining to kill the Flash Platform. Who can trust Adobe any more?</p>
<p>look what Adobe&#8217;s CEO Shantanu Narayen said one and half year ago about the success of Flash as a multi devices design/develop  tool which gets its success from consumers themselves because they want it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93NX9cpgJ4I" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93NX9cpgJ4I</a></p>
<p>why all these words are vaporized now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.rblank.com @ 2012-02-22 15:39:35 -->
